CITIZEN SENSING AS A SOURCE OF EVIDENCE IN COURTS
Early results of the research on these questions: 'The Formosa Case: A Step Forward on the Acceptance of Citizen-Collected Evidence in Environmental Litigation?'
TOWARDS A RIGHT TO CONTRIBUTE TO ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
How can the use of civic evidence in environmental litigation be legitimized on the basis of existing and new rights?
Early results of the research on these questions:
Citizen Sensing from a Legal Standpoint: Legitimizing the Practice under the Aarhus Framework
AVOIDING THE COURT USING CITIZEN SCIENCE IN MEDIATION
Could Citizen Sensing be conceived also as a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) promoting environmental mediation and avoiding the conflict's escalation to courts?
Early results of the research on these questions: Striving for Good Environmental Information: Civic Sentinels of Oil Pollution in the South of the North
The envisaged opportunities of our idea are many, ranging from a closer connection of the affected people to environmental litigation, to a wider, more diverse and inclusive availability of evidence on critical environmental issues, to the possibility of even mitigating the conflict.
I - Citizen Sensing as a source of evidence in courts.
II - Towards a right to contribute to environmental information.
III - Mediating environmental conflicts through Citizen Sensing.
The project output for 2020 is showcased on the #CitizenSData Community page of the European Commission JRC Science Hub.
The project is developed thanks to the support of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant n. 891513, under H2020-EU, and to the concluded research grant of the Dutch Research Council NWO, the Rubicon fellowship n. 66202117.
Drawing lessons for Europe, through comparison and
lesson-learning from successful and failed U.S. cases.
1 - The Formosa case of citizen scientists that brought to court a petrochemical company based in part on volunteered evidence (the U.S)
2 - The AnalyzeBasilicata case of civic monitoring environmental health issues associated with oil extraction (Italy)
Several more under the radar, such as the civic water monitoring around the Lambro river, Lombardy (Italy); the air and noise monitoring around Malpensa Airport and the city of Milan (Italy); the civic observatory on flood risk on the Brenta Bacchiglione river basin, Veneto (Italy); the spill of plastic matter from a water treatment plant from Capaccio (Italy) to the Mediterranean; the case from Greenpeace Belgium and CurieuzeNeuzen on air quality data used in courts.
SensJus policy series
The SensJus policy perspectives are briefs that take stock of lessons learned and analyses performed on more generalizable topics which intersect and intertwine with SensJus core focus. You can download the main briefs below:
what's going on
SensJus is FALLING WALLS ENGAGE WINNER!
SensJus was selected as Winner among the Science Engagement projects and invited to present onstage at the Falling Walls Science Summit 2022, by the Falling Walls Foundation. This year, the Falling Walls Engage Pitches will take place as part of the Falling Walls Science Summit on 7-9 November, Berlin.
Do you wish to be updated regularly on SensJus progresses? Get our quarterly bulletins below or register for our mailing list of SensJus friends to receive them every now and then.
The European Citizen Science Association Conference 2022 is approaching! It will be held from October 5-8 in Berlin, Germany More and preliminary program at https://2022.ecsa-conference.eu/startseite.html SensJus with a number of exciting co-conveners invite all citizen science enthusiasts to participate in two interactive, highly dynamic, physical...
Interview by Anna Berti Suman and Mohammad Gharesifard, with Rosa Arias
SensJus in June has been very busy for a series of events organized or co-curated at the intersection of Art & Science around the JRC site in Ispra and Milan: